Carbon Offsets vs. Carbon Insetting

Carbon Offsets vs. Carbon Insetting
Photo by Priscilla Du Preez 🇨🇦 / Unsplash

The Australian agricultural sector is at the forefront of tackling climate change, embracing carbon reduction strategies like offsets and insetting. With giants like Microsoft leading the charge as significant offset buyers and the AgriWebb-McDonald's partnership demonstrating the growing interest in sustainable sourcing, the industry is experiencing a pivotal shift.

Carbon offsets, while providing a relatively quick solution for companies to neutralize their emissions, often involve projects external to the agricultural operation, such as reforestation or renewable energy development. These initiatives typically have shorter timeframes, with carbon credits generated within a few years. However, concerns about transparency and the risk of "greenwashing" have led to a growing emphasis on insetting.

Carbon insetting, on the other hand, involves on-farm practices like improving soil health, optimizing fertilizer use, and adopting regenerative agriculture techniques. Startups like AgriProve are facilitating soil carbon measurement, enabling farmers to participate in carbon markets and generate income through insetting. This approach aligns with long-term sustainability goals, promoting biodiversity and soil health while reducing emissions over a longer timeframe, often spanning several years to decades.

Regrow and Rumin8 are among the innovative startups supporting farmers in transitioning to insetting practices. Their technologies enable precise measurement and verification of carbon sequestration, providing farmers with the tools and incentives to invest in long-term sustainability.

The AgriWebb-McDonald's partnership exemplifies the growing trend of companies seeking to reduce their Scope 3 emissions by partnering with suppliers engaged in carbon insetting. This approach not only fosters sustainable agriculture but also creates new revenue streams for farmers. With these large companies commiting to Scope 3 Reporting whislt trying to get win win wins for the farmers, themselves, the environment and the other stakeholders involved .

“Sustainability is not a fad or a short-term trend for McDonald’s,” says Belinda Richardson, US Sustainable Sourcing Manager at McDonalds. “McDonald’s is integrating sustainability into our way of doing business as part of a business resiliency strategy. Initiatives, like these climate programs with producers, support both a producer’s business resiliency strategy as well as our own.” 

While both offsets and insetting contribute to emission reduction, insetting is gaining momentum as a more holistic and sustainable approach. It empowers farmers to directly improve their land and contribute to a climate-positive future while reaping financial benefits through carbon markets and premium pricing for sustainable produce.

As the agricultural sector continues to evolve, the balance between offsets and insetting is likely to shift further towards on-farm solutions. With increasing consumer demand for sustainable products and the growing emphasis on transparency, carbon insetting is poised to become the cornerstone of a more resilient and environmentally responsible agricultural industry in Australia.